mot

OPEC again lowered its forecast for 2008 global oil demand growth, adding that the economic slowdown affecting the United States and other industrialized nations is likely to lower demand growth in 2009 as well, the group announced (pdf).

OPEC lowered its 2008 forecast to 1.20% global oil demand growth, down from 1.28%. It was OPEC's fourth downward revision for oil demand this year. The new price structure and slower global economy "have helped dampen oil demand growth in many regions," the cartel said in its July report.

OPEC, which accounts for about 40% of the global oil supply, now expects 2008 demand to rise by 1.03 million barrels per day, or 70,000 barrels per day less than the group's previous forecast.

On Tuesday, oil plunged $6.44 to $138.74 per barrel -- its biggest decline, in percentage terms, since March 2008 -- following Tuesday morning testimony by U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, during which the Fed chair said credit market write-downs were likely to slow the already anemic U.S. economy even more, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday. Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks OPEC's revised forecast is likely to represent another data point the oil bears will like.

Oil price key: Emerging markets

Amid the reports and cacophony of (seemingly) one bad economic news story after another, it's important -- perhaps essential -- to take time out to notice the good economic news stories out there.

And there are good news stories about business models, products, and services out there, because despite this period of extraordinary economic problems, the United States remains the most resilient, adaptable, and technology-advanced economy in the world.

An intelligent parking space system/service

One such good news story: smart parking technology, currently being tested in San Francisco.

This fall, San Francisco will test 6,000 of its 24,000 metered parking spaces in the nation's first large trial of wireless sensor network that will communicate which spaces are free at any moment, The New York Times reported.

U.S. business inventories rose a lower-than-expected 0.3% in May, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Tuesday.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected March 2008 inventories to rise 0.4%.

Further, inventories are now up 5.2% from May 2007, the Commerce Department said. The April business inventory statistic was revised higher to 0.5%.

Meanwhile, the inventory-to-sales ratio declined to 1.24. A year ago, the ratio was 1.26.

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Tuesday the May inventory data can be interpreted two ways, with with positive or negative dimensions, depending on how one views the current corporate stance toward the U.S. economy, and the prospects for economic growth in the quarters ahead.

On the one hand, businesses are keeping inventories at a bare minimum -- a fact that typically is bearish, short-term, for the U.S. economy, Wang said.

Oil plunged more than $8 to about $136 Tuesday at mid-day after Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's indicated the risks to U.S. growth have increased as a result of credit market losses, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday.

Oil fell $9.26 to $135.92 per barrel before recovery slightly. Oil hit a record of $147.27 per barrel on July 11.

The other major energy commodities, likewise, plummeted on the news. Heating oil plunged almost 15 cents to $3.91 per gallon, unleaded gasoline sank almost 17 cents to $3.39 per gallon, and natural gas plunged 44 cents to $11.51 per million BTUs.

"Oil in free-fall"

Energy trader Jim Dietz said "a mini selling frenzy" hit the oil market after Bernanke indicated the U.S. economy was likely to slow further.

"We did have some support for an oil-long trade earlier as an investment when few other investments are working, but that sentiment was quickly wiped out by Bernanke's comments," Dietz said. "We had oil in free-fall for about an hour. The market put 'two and two together.' We had the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout news yesterday [Monday] and Bernanke's bearish comments today. That led a lot of people to conclude we're going to see a slowdown in oil demand growth, which means lower prices."

The dollar fell to a record low against the euro Tuesday morning as traders calculated that U.S. credit market losses will further hurt U.S. economic growth.

The dollar weakened about 1.25 cents to $1.6048 versus the euro before regaining some ground to $1.5995. The dollar also fell one cent versus the British pound to $2.0057 and 1.85 yen to 104.20 versus Japan's yen.

Currency trader Andrew Resnick told BloggingStocks Tuesday the equation is a basic one: with more dollars in supply, each dollar is worth less.

"The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac assistance packages will require more federal spending or federal support though guarantees. That action, plus FDIC takeover of problem banks means more federal outlays, which weakens the value of the dollar," Resnick said. "We've been in a period of increasing federal outlays for the past five years, although I don't think anyone in 2003 anticipated that federal spending would increase to this degree."

So far, billionaire investor George Soros says he doesn't see a light at the end of the tunnel; at least not yet.

Soros told Reuters Monday the crisis over Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) will not be the last, and that the wider credit crunch will continue to effect the already anemic-growth (or worse) U.S. economy.

On Monday, the U.S. Treasury announced a plan to shore-up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including authorization to buy unlimited stakes in and lend to the companies, aimed at stemming a collapse in confidence, Bloomberg News reported Monday. Soros said the U.S. Treasury's plan, and if need be, the resources of the U.S. Federal Reserve, will keep Fannie and Freddie functioning, but that does not blot-out the main negative: the drag effect of home foreclosures on the U.S. economy, Reuters reported.

'Most serious financial crisis of our lifetime'

Calling the year-long global financial market turmoil "the most serious financial crisis of our lifetime," Soros said the negative impact of foreclosures and the credit crisis is likely to increase, creating a deeper U.S. recession.

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks that "while Soros provided a candid description of current events, no doubt derived from considerable research, he may have been a little too stark . . . seeing too much of one side of the asset / liability ledger."

U.S. producer prices soared a seasonally-adjusted 1.8% in June, the U.S Labor Department announced Tuesday, as rising energy prices continued to increase wholesale costs at an alarming rate.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the June PPI index to rise 1.4%. Producer prices increased 1.4% in May and 0.2% in April.

The core rate, which excludes food and energy costs, increased 0.2%, the Labor Department said, below the Bloomberg News 0.3% consensus estimate.

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Tuesday the June PPI is another unfortunate data point for the economy, but it's not as bad as it appears. "The report is bad, but not as bad as it could have been. Energy really drove the index higher. If you took out gasoline prices, PPI would be down a half percentage point," Dawson said. "That said, energy prices are still rising at an alarming rate and they're a cost concern for businesses and individuals alike."

Oil's four-year bull run to +$140 per barrel has increased the wealth of 'petrodollar' nations, and is about set to propel another shift, this time in the bond market.

Petroleum-exporting nations, such as Saudi Arabia and Russia are set to become the biggest creditor nations to the U.S. Government, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

Holdings of petrodollar nations increased 44% to $510 billion through April, Bloomberg News reported Monday -- an increase pace that's set to displace Japan, which holds the largest amount of U.S. Treasuries, at $592.2 billion.

Oil rose about 20 cents to $145.28 per barrel in late Monday afternoon trading.

Market absolutists' complaints notwithstanding, the U.S. Treasury's plan to shore-up Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) will stabilize the bond and credit markets, but it's unlikely to sidetrack a mortgage system revision by the U.S. Congress, in one economist's interpretation.

"[U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson has acted, now is the time for [U.S. Rep.] Barney Frank to react," economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Monday.

At issue: who pays for mortgage risk?

At issue is what constitutes acceptable mortgage risk by banks and mortgage lenders whose loans or asset-backed securities are insured by the U.S. Government or government service enterprises, Wang said.

"The way the system was configured, if banks and mortgage lenders made high-risk loans and won, they collected huge profits. If they made high-risk loans and lost, the government, or the taxpayer, bore the cost," Wang said. "This system is untenable."

What's one likely revision? Wang said he believes a "two-tier mortgage system will emerge." The first group will include loans/mortgages offered by banks "for specialized clients/situations." This batch of mortgages and assets tied to them would not be backed by the government or by GSE insurance, he said.

Traders on the long side of dollar trades cheered the U.S. Treasury's plan to shore-up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as the dollar rose against the world's other major currencies.

The dollar strengthened about one-half cent to $1.5874 versus the euro and two-tenths of a yen to 106.46 versus Japan's yen in Monday morning trading. The dollar was virtually unchanged against the British pound at $1.9877.

On Sunday night, U.S. Treasury Secretary announced a sweeping rescue package and asked Congress for the authority to buy unlimited stakes in and lend to Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), aiming to head-off a collapse in confidence, Bloomberg News reported Monday. Separately, the U.S. Federal Reserve approved Fannie's and Freddie's ability to borrow directly from the central bank.

'Wait and see approach'

Currency Trader Andrew Resnick told BloggingStocks Monday even though the currency and stock markets have initially reacted favorably to the Treasury's / Fed's measures, many currency traders are taking a "wait and see approach" until they know what financial form the assistance to Fannie and Freddie is likely to take.

The dollar was on-pace to record another weekly decline Friday - - undoing the gains against the euro and pound earlier this summer- - as traders and analysts debated the likely next step for the U.S. Congress and/or the U.S. Federal Reserve on the heels of possible additional massive, mortgage-asset-related write-downs by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The dollar traded at about $1.5888 to the euro Friday at mid-day, down about 1 cent, and also within about 1 cent of an all-time low versus the euro. The dollar also traded at $1.9878 to the British pound, also down about 1 cent, and off about 1 yen to 106.09 versus Japan's yen.

Currency trader Andrew Resnick said that given the dollar's decade-long slide versus the world's other major currencies, it's difficult to fathom further dollar declines, but that's what the economic fundamentals suggest.

"From one perspective, you have to ask, at what point do central bankers say the dollar's slide poses serious risks of commodity prices rises and inflation, with negative consequences for global growth?" Resnick. "On the scale of competing demands, you can make a strong argument that the dollar can not be permitted to slide much further."

However, Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), which face additional losses, Bloomberg News reported Friday, could come under full control, also called conservatorship, of government regulators, or receive bridge loans from the U.S. Congress or the Fed, Resnick said, absent a private equity investment. In any event, if Fannie's and Freddie's additional losses hit key levels, "we're looking at another enormous government obligation, and that's not good news for the dollar," Resnick said. "It means more dollars in circulation, which combined with the weak U.S. economy, will drive the dollar lower."

Resnick added that he presently is short with the dollar in the euro / dollar, British pound / dollar, and yen / dollar currency pairings.

At first glance - - investigating whether OPEC will be able to stunt oil's rise to $150 per barrel may seem moot.

Not so, says energy trader Jim Dietz, and he cited three reasons.

First, the oil shorts - - those who believe oil is overpriced / too high - - are likely to mount a rigorous defense of $150. (Oil traded up $4.75 to $146.40 per barrel Friday at mid-day after hitting a record high of $147.27 earlier in the day.) "It will not be an easy barrier to mount. It will be easier to break than the $100 barrier but keep in mind it took several months and at least 5 sequences to break $100, once we got within the range," Dietz said. "Look for almost as tough price resistance at $150."

Second, many oil longs - - those who calculated that oil is trending higher - - will take profits at $150, Dietz said. "The $150 mark will result in many players and institutions cashing in their long trades, on rationality grounds," Dietz said. "For example, if you established trades at $80 or $85, common sense says $150 represents a good time to exit. Likewise for more-daring institutions that went long above $100. The thinking will be 'We're at $150 after a high entry point. How long do we expect this insanity to go on? Let's take some profits and reduce our exposure.' That will add to selling pressure." Dietz added that he is presently flat, or has no open energy trading positions - - his normal stance for a Friday in the summer.

Finally, those facts, combined with already-announced oil production increases by Saudi Arabia, will enhance OPEC's ability to slow gains in the price of oil near/at $150 per barrel, Dietz said. Further, Dietz believes Saudi Arabia will announce still another production increase, perhaps as large as 300,000 barrels, to calm markets, "and eliminate doubts in some energy corners about its spare capacity and ability to ramp-up production."

U.S. consumer confidence in July remained near 28-year lows, an indication American adults continue to be concerned about rising energy and food prices, job layoffs, and the prospects for a U.S. economic recovery.

The Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers said its reading of confidence rose just slightly to to 56.6 in July, from 56.4 in June. The index stood at 59.8 in May, 62.8 in April, and 69.5 in March, Reuters reported Friday.

The July reading was a scant rise and hardly a positive data point for the economy, given that June's reading was the index's lowest since May 1980 -- a period also characterized by high oil/gasoline prices and a sluggish U.S. economy.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had predicted that the May index would fall to 56.0.

Americans 'guarded and concerned' about economy

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Friday July's consumer sentiment reading did nothing to shift his evaluation regarding the American people's stance toward the U.S. economy.

"The public remains guarded and concerned, with little optimism, save for a few, fortunate income and wealth segments. We have the most serious economic downturn in a decade, from the stand point of the typical person or employee. Consumers are seeing gasoline and food prices rise by the week, and they're concerned about job losses," Dawson said. "When you combine job worries with price rises just about everywhere you look, with a housing sector that shows little signs of recovery, and the lower home values that trend implies, it doesn't breed consumer confidence, so it's not surprising the [University of] Michigan survey reading is near its lowest point in decades."

June import prices rose 2.6%, the U.S. Labor Department announced Friday, driven higher by rising petroleum prices and a falling dollar.

Excluding the often-volatile petroleum component, June import prices increased 0.8%, the Labor Department said.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected June import prices to rise 1.8%. Import prices also rose a revised 2.6% in May; they increased 2.8% in April, and 3.1% in March.

In the last 12 months import prices are up 20.5% -- the biggest year-over-year increase on record, the Labor Department said. It's also a level that historically indicates that U.S. consumer price inflation will trend higher, due to price pressure from foreign goods/services.

Prices for imported petroleum were a major factor in the aforementioned price rise -- up 78.6% in one year.

Meanwhile, U.S. exports prices increased 1% in June, after rising 0.4% in May. Farm export prices increased 2.2%, while non-farm exports increased 0.9%.

Economist David H. Wang said the June import/export price report was yet another negative one for the U.S economy. "The report continues to feature the impact of record-high oil prices, which are boosting inflation just about across the price spectrum," Wang said. "Import prices are making the Fed's [U.S. Federal Reserve's] job of lowering inflation harder. The U.S. needs a substantial, sustained decline in oil prices to get control of inflation."

The U.S. trade deficit fell to $59.8 billion in May (PDF file), the U.S. Commerce Department announced Friday, as exports rose at a much faster pace than imports in the month.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the May trade deficit to be $62.1 billion. The April trade deficit totaled $60.2 billion; March, $56.5 billion.

In May, exports increased to 0.9% to $157.5 billion. Imports increased 0.3% to a record $217.3 billion, with imported petroleum increasing 6.5% to $31.2 billion - - a cost component that accounted for almost the entire increase in the import total.

During May, the average price for a barrel of crude oil increased a record $9.47 to a record $106.28, the Commerce Department said.

U.S. exports shine again in May

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Friday the May trade deficit report "represents good news on an otherwise very sub-par economic landscape. Once again, as in April, if you take away oil and control for inflation, we can see a continued downward track in the deficit, led by rising exports," Wang said. "International demand for U.S. goods is a bright spot in our economy. Without it, we would be in a pronounced recession."